So, the first glaring issue with your methods here: selection bias. Major, irrevocable selection bias. Your followers on LinkedIn will be overwhelmingly middle-upper class, White, and centrist – center-right, politically (though I’m sure many would identify as “liberal”). They’ll largely be employed in tech, marketing, business, or adjacent sectors, and they’re likely less inclined to know (or care) what is happening below the poverty line. There is no “we” in your results; there is you, and people who are either like you in meaningful ways or aspire to be so.

Tl;dnr: would never pass peer review. Also, you ever going to mention your complicity in the ICE debacle, or nah? Just because you’ve stepped down doesn’t mean you’re not involved, and anyone who consumes your content should at least be aware that you value profit over human rights.