I think her case has some potential to incite broader discussion about the intersections of compulsory normalcy, disability, and capitalism. I’ve seen it already in niche spaces such as content produced by Project LETS. That said, while these conversations are prevalent in my echo chamber, I’m definitely non-plussed with broader narratives. This may be one case that eventually gets ascribed with retroactive meaning (that’s my optimistic take) but it’s currently reinscribing the sane/crazy dichotomy, as far as I can see.